“Why can’t we
touch God?” one of the puzzled Preschoolers asked after my “resurrection
lesson” in chapel this week. “And why can’t we see God?” piped up another one, with concern in his voice. While I
muttered something about God being too marvelous and powerful to touch except
in our hearts, I wished that I could have taken back my words after reading
today’s Gospel lesson. “Touch me and see,” says the resurrected Jesus to the
frightened and disbelieving disciples. The kids were definitely onto something
with their questions.
Of course, we
adults have trouble with the resurrection, too. We have trouble believing it;
we have trouble conceptualizing it; we have trouble describing it. You might
think that our struggle with the resurrection is just a modern reaction, born
of a scientific worldview and distance from the event itself. But look at the
disciples: everyone from Mary Magdalene and the women at the tomb, to Thomas,
to the disciples on the road to Emmaus, to the whole group gathered in today’s
lesson … they are all afraid and disbelieving when confronted with their risen
Lord. The ink that has been spilled and the theological arguments that have
been fought over explaining the resurrection fill whole libraries, and still we
doubt and scratch our heads. A ghost--we can deal with that. A spiritual,
disembodied feeling in our hearts--we know about those. A resuscitated body,
even that--we can understand
medically. But a new kind of body—a
body that can walk through walls, yet still eat fish—come on, you’ve got to be
kidding me! Unlike my preschool friends, I’m much more comfortable with a God
that I cannot see and touch, than I am with a God wrapped up in this strange,
improbable kind of body.
It’s not just about Jesus, either, you
know. When we say in the Creed each week that we believe in the “resurrection
of the body and the life everlasting,” we are saying that we believe that our bodies will at some point rise
again, that we too will join Jesus in this new kind of embodied life after death. The
resurrection of the body is a central tenet of our Christian doctrine, yet it
is one that we sensible, rational-minded Episcopalians keep tucked away in the
shadows of implausibility. "Wouldn't a purely spiritual resurrection seem more logical--for
us, as well as for Jesus?" we wonder. Don’t we read in the Bible itself that the desires of
the flesh are occasions for sin? Aren’t our bodies what pull us away from God
in the first place? Surely an
unchangeable God wouldn’t have much use for our frail flesh? Doesn’t God love
our spirits best, our clever minds and our loving hearts? Why not be done with
bodies as soon as possible? With all of the half-naked bodies on billboards and
the money spent on fashion and plastic surgery and the time spent at the gym, I
know that we human beings are interested in grooming and “perfecting” our
earthly bodies, but I’m not so sure that we believe that God loves them enough to give them
everlasting life.
I remember that I didn’t have much
use for my often sickly, always uncoordinated body, when I was younger. My arms
were the puny ones that always collapsed in Red Rover; my feet were what
tripped me up in dance class; and my lungs were what kept me home with asthma
when I wanted to be out having fun. It was my mind that was my friend. It
allowed me to escape my unreliable body in books and in the world of
imagination. It was what brought me attention and approval at school. If I had
to pick something to keep for eternity, it would be my disembodied mind or my
ethereal yet loving soul. My body I could do without.
It wasn’t until I had children, I
think, that I gained any appreciation at all for my body. The miracle of
pregnancy and birth created in me a respect for what the body could do, for the
way in which we are all so carefully and wondrously made. Indeed, when I think
about Incarnation, about God “taking on flesh,” I think first of the baby
Jesus. His silky smooth baby skin; his perfect little fingers and toes; his
sweet baby smile …. If God is going to take up residence in some kind of body,
the fresh, new, adorable body of a baby just might suffice. God entering the
world, loving the world, through the miracle of birth at Christmas—I have no
problem with that kind of Incarnation. But our Christian faith does not just
stop with Christmas. Like our bodies, the body of the sweet little baby Jesus
must ache and bleed, must suffer and die.
Therefore, Jesus returns to his
disciples with his body, with the same frail, wounded body that had hung on the
Cross. With a body that is hungry for some supper. With a wounded body that
they are invited to see and to touch. This new, post-suffering, post-death body
is also part of Incarnation. The triumphant God did not shed flesh as soon as
He could. The triumphant Easter God did not come out of the tomb as a golden
beam of light or a soft and loving breeze. The risen Christ came to the
disciples, presenting them with his beaten-up body to touch, rather than
filling their minds with some kind of spiritual enlightenment. Barbara Brown
Taylor writes, “Touching the truth with our minds alone is not enough. We are
made to touch it with our bodies. I think this is why Christian tradition
clings to the reality of resurrection, even when no one can explain it to
anyone else’s satisfaction … The resurrection of the dead is the radical
insistence that matter matters to God.”[1]
Matter matters to God. This is the
lesson that we are to draw from the stories about bodily resurrection. On this
Earth Day, that is an important lesson for us to hear. Not only does God love
and sustain the human bodies that God created, but God loves and sustains the
whole earth, the sun, the moon, and the stars, as well. Theologian Sallie
McFague rather controversially calls the creation, “God’s body.” For McFague,
the whole creation is the sign of God that we can touch and see, and with the
universe as a metaphor for God’s body, our care for creation takes on a whole
new level of importance. If Christ appears to us eating fish and bearing
wounds, sanctifying our hungers and our suffering and inviting our touch, can
Christ also not hold out to us a hand scarred by mountaintop coal removal? Can
he not ask us to touch him as we place our feet in the cool, clear waters of a
sparkling stream or on the warm, soft ocean sands?
To our doubts about the loveliness of
our bodies, to our doubts about God’s commitment to our world, to our doubts
about the strength and durability of Incarnation, to our doubts about the truth
of Resurrection, Jesus says, “touch me and see.” To our preschoolers I should have said what I say to you
today: taste God in the crisp wafer and in the wine that burns as it runs down
your throat. Touch God in the warm hand squeezing yours as you pray together.
Feel God in the cool, moist earth that you turn with your trowel as you pull
away the weeds. Bask in God as the sun shines warm upon your neck. Watch God as
the warm, sudsy water washes away the dirt on that wall or pew. Hear God in the
laughter that rings out across the fields. Smell God in the red rose’s perfume.
Sure, God is more than sunshine and roses. But matter matters to God. All that
pertains to bodies, matters to God. The resurrection of the body tells us that
our salvation, our healing, our eternal life, is to be found there. Life is not
just for the soul and faith is not just for the mind. Touch and see—and you will
have the strength to testify.
Excellent article, Ann! Perhaps I should share your story about the children's questions at St. Alban's worship tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Jerry! Feel free to share the story.
Delete