"Do not be afraid; I am the first and the last, and the living one. I was dead, and see, I am alive forever and ever; and I have the keys of Death and of Hades. Now write what you have seen, what is, and what is to take place after this." Rev. 1:17-19.

Saturday, November 5, 2022

For All the Saints

 

 

I can't ever think about All Saints' Day without remembering my time as an undergraduate at Sewanee, worshiping in All Saints' Chapel and singing the majestic hymn, "For All the Saints" at every major university celebration. As I read this week's Gospel for All Saints’ Day, I remembered a conversation that I had with my old college roommate at a recent reunion. We were looking at a new baptismal font that had been added to the chapel since our time there. I passed my hand over the carved stone figures. They stood tall, pompous, and unsmiling all around the large cement bowl, hemming in the holy water. My friend touched them and laughed. “Oh, look! These must be part of the ‘never-ending succession of benefactors.'"

As undergraduates, you see, we used to poke one another in the ribs and giggle during the university prayer. Solemnly intoned much too often, it was a prayer that asked God to bless all who had contributed to the institution and to “raise up to the University, we humbly pray thee, a never-failing succession of benefactors.” I used to imagine God's response, picturing God pouring plump middle-aged men and women onto the campus. In their fur coats, clerical collars, and fine suits, they would parade around and fork over large sums of money to the latest capital campaign. In my youthful idealism, I felt that this was a tacky blessing to be constantly bothering God about in our official prayer.

          Of course, now that I am a plump older woman in a clerical collar, praying about my own parish finances, I am not as easily amused by the phrase. I still wonder, though, how often we in the Church do confuse saints and benefactors. Don’t we often see the Church as an institution held up by virtuous pillars of saints, by men and women carved in rigid stone who guard the status quo, by benefactors with their names on brass plaques for giving of their treasure, time, and talent to keep the institution going? Don’t we often think of blessing as something that we cajole out of God, through words or good deeds, like a university negotiates a bequest from a powerful donor?

Our Gospel reading for this All Saints’ Day does its best to shake up this common idea of blessing and of sainthood. Luke’s Beatitudes tell us what it means to be blessed. They certainly make it clear that blessing is not marked by a never-failing stream of wealth—or even by a secure stream of happiness, for that matter. The saints that Jesus sculpts around his baptismal font are poor, hungry, weeping, hated, scorned, and cast aside. They're people who can turn to those who hate them and offer them blessing. They're people who seem to give more than they are ever given in this world.

Luke doesn't offer us the easier spiritual take on Jesus' Beatitudes that Matthew provides us in the Sermon on the Mount. Matthew's Jesus blesses the “poor in spirit” rather than society’s poor. Matthew's Jesus blesses those who hunger for righteousness, rather than those who don’t get enough to eat. But Luke is talking about the real world that we know and participate in. I can’t help but pull back uneasily from Luke’s stark blessings. I don't want to bless those who hate me. And I see myself much too clearly sitting among those whom Jesus curses: the rich, the filled, the joyful, the acclaimed. One of my favorite prayers is that evening collect that asks God to “shield the joyous.” I want God’s blessing to shield me, not to throw me to the wolves! Why do God’s blessings here have to be so totally backwards, so dismally painful?

          Think for a moment about the saints, the blessed ones, among us. Pick your favorite saint from the list that the church has handed down throughout the ages.  Or think about a special child of God with whom you have shared a pew or a friendship. Isn’t it always the case that those who have blessed us the most have at some point experienced the most profound pain in their own lives? Think of St. Francis of Assisi who heard God’s call as he lay ill and hopeless as a prisoner of war, and who had to give up his wealth and his heritage before he could serve God. Think of the famous women mystics like St. Julian of Norwich, St. Teresa of Avila. They were gifted with magnificent visions of God, yet they suffered terrible physical or psychological ailments and extreme rejection by others. Think of St. Paul, with his terrible “thorn in the flesh,” or of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. who grew up black in the Jim Crow South and endured countless threats before being murdered. We can’t deny it. There is something about suffering that opens us up to God, and there is something about prosperity that lulls us into a dangerous sleep.

There's a wonderful book about some of the female Christian saints called Enduring Grace. There's even a copy in our library, if you're interested in reading it. The title is a play on words: This book shows how God's grace "endures" in the world through the lives of these holy women. Yet it also shows how, in their personal suffering, they each "endured" the grace of God's difficult blessing. This word "grace" appears several times in the Greek of our Gospel lesson, too. Grace is love that is freely given; it's love poured out without calculation, without expecting or receiving anything in return. It is love given to enemies, to those from whom we can expect no love back. It's the love that God in Christ shows us on the Cross. Grace is the love that God freely gives us, so that we can give it freely to others.[1]

The blessing that God offers us, you see, is a moving, swirling love. It belongs to the dance of Love that is the Trinity itself. It demands transformation and movement. It cannot survive in hearts and souls that refuse to be torn open. It suffocates in customs or in institutions that refuse to break. Christian Sharen points out in his work on blessing that our blessing always connects to the need of another. From the beginning of creation, God blesses with love and goodness everything that God has made. Blessing in the Scriptures always multiplies as we pass it on, bearing fruit in and through the suffering that is inevitable in this world.[2]

So what about that baptismal font at Sewanee, ringed with straight-backed saints who hold in the holy waters? I’m thinking that the Church would do better with Frederick Buechner’s more fluid image of blessing. Buechner describes the saints as handkerchiefs dropped by God during God’s “holy flirtation with the world.”[3] Imagine the movement of a flirtation, the quick give and take, the strong, dynamic energy passing back and forth between two people. Imagine God looking for a relationship with you and me, with our world. Imagine God testing the waters, reaching out and touching, withdrawing in a blush. Into that movement, God drops grace-filled blessing. It flutters down into our lives on the wind of the Spirit, like a handkerchief.

“Pick me up,” the blessing begs. Pick me up and pass me into a waiting hand. Please don’t stuff me away into your dark pocket. Look up, like Jesus looked up into the eyes of his disciples, and pass blessing on, no matter the cost.” And we saints stick out a trembling hand.

 



[1] See "Graceful Life," at https://www.saltproject.org/progressive-christian-blog/2019/11/2/graceful-life-salts-commentary-for-all-saints-day.

[2] Christian Sharen, “Blessing,” in The Blackwell Companion to Practical Theology, Bonnie Miller-McLemore, ed., Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2012.

[3] ] Frederick Buechner, quoted in a sermon by Samuel Candler, http://day1.org/2379-saint_carlton_is_lowest

 

Sunday, October 30, 2022

Out on a Limb for Jesus

 

           


 If you're like me, you've had the rather annoying song, "Zacchaeus was a wee little man, and a wee little man was he!" going through your head since you heard the Gospel lesson today. If you know the song, you might also think you know this sweet little story. Well, I'm here to tell you today that there's actually more to consider here than a cute story.

            Did you know, for example, that Zacchaeus might not have even been a "wee little man?" That's right! Check out the vague pronouns in the text. The bible says that "he" was trying to see who Jesus was, but "he" couldn't see, because "he" was short in stature. One famous preacher, Fred Craddock, suggests that Jesus might have been the one who was short![1]  Maybe Zacchaeus couldn't see who Jesus was because the crowds were towering over a wee, pudgy Jesus, hiding him from view. Does that mess with your image of God's Son? As one who's "vertically-challenged" myself, I kind of like the notion that Jesus, too, was a short man. Why not?

            More importantly, though, I want to suggest that Zacchaeus wasn't quite the sinner that we assume him to be. Oh yes, he is indeed the chief tax collector in Jericho. And yes, tax collectors were collaborators with Rome. They took money from their own downtrodden people to give it to the occupying authorities. And yes, tax collectors had ample opportunity to fill their own pockets with the hard-earned coins of the poor. It's safe to say that no one in the crowd of Jews in that Jericho marketplace liked Zacchaeus. They probably turned away in disgust when they saw him coming. Having recently lived in Kentucky, I, for example, love to imagine Mitch McConnell up there in that tree. Can you picture it? With his fancy suit and tie, clinging precariously to a tree branch, his bulging eyes peering through the leaves at Jesus down below? Can you imagine your least favorite politician or celebrity forced to climb a tree to see Jesus? Isn't that fun?

        Now, with that image in your mind's eye .... did you know that the name Zacchaeus literally means "innocent" or "righteous" in Hebrew? What if Zacchaeus were a tall, even righteous tax collector? The exception to the rule? There might even be further proof for Zacchaeus' goodness in our text. Greek verbs work differently than English verbs. I won't bore you with a grammar lesson, but I will say that the future tense of Zacchaeus' response is merely the choice of the translator. Instead of promising, "I will henceforth give half my possessions to the poor," Zacchaeus might just as well be testifying to his own generosity in the present time. He might be saying, "Here I am, Jesus! I give half of my possessions to the poor, and if I have defrauded anyone of anything, I pay them back four times as much." And then, Jesus responds to his righteous deeds with approval, telling the judging, disapproving crowds that "today, healing has come to the family of this righteous son of Abraham."

             Perhaps Luke wants us to think about the ways in which we judge others, the ways in which we assume that we know other people, especially those we don't like. In our polarized times, perhaps it is good to remember that our labels are not Jesus' labels. Jesus wants to break bread with us all. Father John Shea writes: "To Jesus every person was a guest. An invitation had gone out from the heart of all life to every heart within life, for does the rain discriminate or the sun play favorites? [Jesus'] voice was the music of welcome in the ears of rejection; his presence a silver setting in the slums with linen napkins on the laps of lepers."[2]

             Whether he's righteous or a sinner, Zacchaeus is desperate for Jesus. That's what strikes me about him today. He's desperate enough to climb up in a tree, to risk looking foolish, to throw caution to the wind. He's desperate enough "go out on a limb."[3] When was the last time that you went out on a limb for someone? I'd do just about anything for my loved ones: For Don, for my kids, for my grand-kids. And I go out on a limb when I really get riled up about some injustice, too. If children are being hurt, that will get me up and going. Righteous anger can usually spur me on. And of course, my own pain will also get me to take action pretty fast. What about you? 

    When was the last time you went out on a limb for Jesus? When was the last time that you were totally desperate to catch a glimpse of him? It's probably safe to say that, when it comes to seeing Jesus, most of us are satisfied with standing around in the comfy crowd down below, aren't we? Stopping by his teaching to overhear a good word on our way to someplace else. Huddling with our friends as we listen, backs turned to those on the fringes. Pretty satisfied with ourselves for even standing there. Even I can sometimes forget that the deep love for which I am so desperate resides in Jesus' eyes. I forget that the meaning for which I long lies in Jesus' shadow. I forget that my gnawing hunger for freedom from guilt and shame is satisfied only by the bread that Jesus offers me.

 Barbara Brown Taylor once said that "our duty in this time of famine [for meaning] is not to end the human hunger and thirst for God's words but to intensify it, until the whole world bangs its forks for God's food." She calls on us to "increase our sense of loss until we are so hungry and lonely for God that we do something about it ... as a people."[4] After my experience at the Trunk or Treat last night, I think that she has a good point.

If you read your Buzz this week, you'll know that our neighbors asked if they could have a Trunk or Treat in our parking lot yesterday. The house where they used to celebrate Halloween burned in the Marshall Fire. Since they invited us all to attend, I was able to talk with several of the young parents. Three different moms pointed me out to their children.

        "She's the minister of this church," they explained. "She does all the .... um, teaching and um .... stuff inside." 

        The children, you see, and probably some of these moms, have never been inside a church before. As the children eyed me with curiosity, the mothers explained that their children have often expressed a mysterious interest in religion. They even asked to go to a church, but the moms were wary and fearful. Maybe sometime they would do it ..... they added.  The idea of walking in a church probably felt about as uncomfortable to them as shimmying up a tall tree in a crowd.

I, of course, sprang into action. "Bring your children by anytime," I offered. "I can show them around! Or come to a service!" I was trying not to sound too eager, like we wanted to gobble them up or anything. I added, "Even if you don't want to come sit in a service with your kids, maybe there is something that we could help you with? Something spiritual that might speak to your lives?" There was a long silence. Then one mom spoke softly and a bit wistfully. "I wouldn't even know what that would be ...." she offered, her voice trailing off.

I wonder if we've been hungry so long that we don't even know anymore what it's like to be full. If we church-going folks could get in touch with our own hunger for seeing Jesus, though, wouldn't that be something? What can we do to get our stomachs rumbling for some extravagant love, for some miraculous healing, for some forgiveness and mercy? What if we wanted a taste of Jesus so badly that we pounded our fists on the table? What if we wanted to get a glimpse of Jesus so badly that we went out on a limb? 

I know what would happen. He would spot us up there right away. His face would light up, and he'd say, "Hey, there you are! Come down and get ready to feast! I want to come to St. Ambrose today!" And filled with joy, we would testify, "Look how we are giving of ourselves for the life of the world!

Now that would be real parish revitalization!

 



[1] No footnote here, except that my husband heard it in a sermon in Princeton many years ago.

[2] John Shea, Stories of Faith (Chicago: Thomas More Press, 1980), 171-72.

[3] William J. Adams, Proper 26 Year C, found at https://www.sundaygospeltalk.com.

[4] Barbara Brown Taylor, When God is Silent (Lanham, MD: Cowley Publications, 1998), ?.